Prince Harry tabloid lawsuit: UK unsafe for his children

A lawyer for a group of British tabloids is asking a judge in London to toss out lawsuits by Prince Harry, Elton John and several other celebrities who allege phone tapping and other invasions of privacy. Prince Harry was photographed arriving at court in London this morning for a hearing relating to his legal action against a UK newspaper group. An ANL spokesperson added that the claims were “unsubstantiated and highly defamatory claims, based on no credible evidence,” Britain’s PA Media news agency reports. Charles, William and other members of the royal family have not publicly commented on the claims Harry makes in “Spare.” A decision regarding whether Harry has an arguable case will be made in the coming weeks, BBC News reports. The duke’s legal team has indicated that a second judicial review claim into whether he should be able to pay privately for police protection has been launched, the outlet added.
The judge, Mr Justice Nicklin, observed that Harry and his fellow claimants “may need to adjust their expectations” regarding the use of Burrows’ evidence. When the Duke of Sussex unexpectedly arrived at the high court on Monday morning he became the most senior royal to appear in a courtroom since Princess Anne admitted being in charge of an English bull terrier that was dangerously out of control in a public space. Subsequent revelations five years later forced Murdoch to shut the paper, led to its editor and others being jailed, a public inquiry into press standards, and millions of pounds being paid in damages by NGN and another newspaper group. For 14 free days, you can have access to a world of in-depth analyses, investigative journalism, top opinions and a range of features. You can cancel anytime and if you cancel within 14 days you won’t be billed.



He blames an overly aggressive press for the 1997 death of his mother, Princess Diana, and accuses the media of similarly hounding of Meghan. In July, Nicklin ruled that the article was defamatory, allowing the case to proceed. The judge has not yet considered issues such as whether the story was accurate or in the public interest. Harry has said he wants to make reforming the British media his life’s work. He blamed an overly aggressive press for the 1997 death of his mother, Princess Diana, and also accused the media of hounding Meghan. Owner Rupert Murdoch shut down the newspaper amid a criminal investigation and public uproar.
The Duke of Sussex sued the publisher in February over an article in the Mail on Sunday newspaper which alleged he tried to keep secret details of his legal fight with Britain’s interior ministry to reinstate his police protection. Prince Harry and Elton John were in a London court Monday as the lawyer for a group of British tabloids prepared to ask a judge to toss the lawsuit they brought with several other high-profile people who allege phone-tapping and other invasions of privacy. Prince Harry lawsuit against newspaper publisher set for May trial Britain’s Prince Harry’s lawsuit against the publisher of the Daily Mirror newspaper over allegations of phone hacking will go to trial in May, a … The attorney said in the statement that the private security team that the Sussexes pay for in the United States “cannot replicate the necessary police protection needed” in the U.K. The lawyer added, “In the absence of such protection, Prince Harry and his family are unable to return to his home.” There will be a high court hearing to review the duke’s plea for police protection, the July 22 filing states.

“He clearly does want to make it known that this is very important to him,” she said of the lawsuit being debated. Fellow accuser Sadie Frost, the actress ex-wife of Jude Law, was also in court, where Harry sat just feet away from a large group of reporters. “Good morning,” the 38-year-old Duke of Sussex said brightly with a big smile — briefly bumping into a photographer while marching into court. While the plaintiffs’ attorney, David Sherborne, admits that many of the alleged violations took place between 1993 and 2011, others happened in 2018 and even later. Their attorney, Adrian Beltrami, wrote that “It would be surprising indeed for any reasonably informed member of the public, let alone a figure in the public eye, to have been unaware of these matters.”
The hearing will not require oral evidence, making Harry’s appearance at court even more unusual. Despite the ongoing legal battle, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have continued to visit the U.K. In June, they traveled there with their children, Archie Harrison, 3, and Lilibet “Lili” Diana, 13 months, forQueen Elizabeth II’s Platinum Jubilee celebration. Their daughter celebrated her first birthday during the trip, her first in the country. Harry and Meghan, who are often seen with bodyguards in public, and the Royal family have not disclosed what security arrangements were granted to the family.
In September 2021, Harryfiled for a judicial review of a February 2020government decisionto deny him the taxpayer-funded security he lost access to after he and wife Meghan Markleannounced they were stepping downas senior members of the Royal family. Prince Harry photographed arriving at the Royal Courts of Justice in London for the second day of his lawsuit against ANL, March 28, 2023. The day before, the prince bumped into a member of the press while using the court’s main entrance.

“Those categorical denials were believed by a number of individuals who bring claims,” he told the court on the fourth and final day of the preliminary hearing, adding only recent discoveries had turned their suspicions into grounds for action. Judge Timothy Fancourt ruled on Wednesday that Harry’s case, which alleges unlawful information gathering on behalf of MGN journalists between 1996 and 2011, should be part of the trial. “When Diana died, she didn’t have police protection. She had a private security team at that point,” said Victoria Murphy, ABC News royal contributor. “And I think it’s very clear that Prince Harry feels that the police protection is superior and that that is what he wants for his family.”
A four-day preliminary hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice is now underway, where judges will decide if the case proceeds further. The jet-setting, California-based youngest son of King Charles III shocked waiting press when he unexpectedly jumped out of a limo at London’s High Court ahead of a hearing against the publisher of the Daily Mail. ANL denies the allegations and the preliminary will consider legal arguments and a judge will decide whether it will go any further. The Royal Family “without a doubt” withheld information from Prince Harry about phone hacking, the Duke of Sussex has claimed.
The memoir is a detailed account of Harry’s rift with his family, his decision to leave his senior royal role in 2020 and how he felt growing up as the “spare” to his older brother Prince William, the heir to the throne. In court documents, legal representatives for the Home Office wrote that Ravec never received an offer to fund security from the prince, and that the committee would have “rejected any such offer as a matter of principle.” Harry’s lawyer spoke of tensions between the prince and the Queen’s private secretary, Edward Young. Harry and his family no longer have publicly-funded security since their step back from royal life. The case alleges that unlawful practices were used to get information for stories by the publisher.

Leave a comment